Ragubalan v. State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17-06-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR

1. Ragubalan

2. Selvaraj

3. Jothi Petitioners Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, ATTUR RURAL Police Station, Salem District.

Crime No.Not Known of 2025.

Respondent PRAYER To enlarge the Petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.Not Known of 2025, pending on the file of the respondent and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For Respondent(s):

Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehend at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(1), 118(1) and 351(2) of

BNS in connection with the case in Crime No.Not known of 2025, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions submitted that a petition enquiry is pending and an FIR has not been registered.

3. In view of the same, the respondent shall conduct and conclude the enquiry within a period of two weeks from today. If the petitioners' appearance are required, the respondent shall issue a notice under Section 35 of BNSS, 2023 and on such notice, the petitioners shall appear before the respondent. Till the conclusion of the enquiry, the respondent police shall not arrest the petitioners.

4. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

17-06-2025 gbi Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To 1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, ATTUR RURAL Police Station, Salem District.

Crime No.Not Known of 2025 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

M.NIRMAL KUMAR J.

gbi CRL OP No. 17060 of 17-06-2025