Ypalaniappa Mudaliar v. Natarajan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA S.A.No.844 of 2002

1. Palaniappa Mudaliar

2. Muthulakshmi

3. Sivakami

4. Parvathi ... Appellants Vs.

Natarajan ... Respondent Prayer:- Second appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against decree and judgment dated 09.10.2000 in A.S.No.20 of 1999 on the file of the Sub Court, Udumelpet, upholding the decree and judgment in O.S.No.574 of 1995, dated 14.09.1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pollachi. For Appellants : Mr.S.Haja Mohidee Gisthi For Respondent : Ms.P.T.Ramadevi

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellants reports no instruction from the appellants and also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.

The appellant is also not present. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

gsi/rts To

1. The Sub Judge, Udumelpet.

2. The District Munsif Judge, Pollachi.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. (+2copies) +1cc to Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, Advocate Sr.57373 S.A.No.844 of 2002 br[co] srg 12/09/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/