Dhanalakshmi v. Malini Nandhagopal

C.M.P.No.14372 of 2024 in C.M.A.SR.No.86295 of 2024 C.M.P.No.14372 of 2024 in C.M.A.SR.No.86295 of 2024 R.HEMALATHA,J.

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 30 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

2. Since the 1st respondent remained absent before the Tribunal and was set exparte, issuance of notice to the 1st respondent is dispensed with.

3. Though notice was served on the 2nd respondent and their name was printed in the cause list, there is no representation on their behalf.

4. Mr.D.Palaniswamy, learned counsel appearing for the 3rd Respondent did not raise any serious objection in allowing this petition.

5. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 30 days in filing the above appeal is condoned.

R.HEMALATHA,J.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.No.14372 of 2024 in C.M.A.SR.No.86295 of 2024 vum

6. Registry is directed to number the main Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and print the name of Mr.D.Palaniswamy, counsel for the 3rd Respondent in the main C.M.A. and post the same for admission in due course.

7. It is made clear that for the period of delay of 30 days, the petitioners / appellants will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal. 09.09.2024 vum C.M.P.No.14372 of 2024 in C.M.A.SR.No.86295 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis