Madras High CourtCRL A/674/2002dismissed for nonprosecution

Ramachandran v. Arumugam Pillai

2018-02-13Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13.02.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN Crl.A.No.674 of 2002 Ramachandran .. Appellant Vs.

1.Arumugam Pillai 2.Rathinasabapathy Pillai 3.Sivakozhunthu 4.Aavatti Iyyasamy 5.Veerasamy 6.Thangarasu 7.Rajagopal Pillai 8.Perumal 9.Arumugam 10.Thirunavukarasu 11.Govindarasu 12.Gundumani @ Kathirvel 13.Arul 14.Vadivel 15.Kaliyan 16.Pachamuthu 17.Shanmugam 18.Ganesan 19.Thangavel .. Respondents Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 25.04.2000 made in C.C.No.179 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thittagudi.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.02.2018, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, the case was directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 13.02.2018. Even today, ( 13.02.2018), there is no representation on behalf of the appellant either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the criminal appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

kkd To The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thittagudi.

Copy to:The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.

SS(CO) sm:26.2.2018 Crl.A.No.674 of 2002 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/