Tmt. Saraswathi Thomas v. The Regional Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.09.2022 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.T.RAJA, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Saraswathi Thomas .. Appellant Vs 1.The Regional Manager, Kendriya Vidyala Sangathan, IIT Campus, Chennai - 600 036.

2.The Head Office, Kendriya Vidyala Sangathan, 18, Industrial Area Shaheed Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi-110 016.

3.The Principal, CRPF Kendira Vidyalaya Schools, Avadi-600 055.

.. Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 26.7.2022 made in W.P.No.15974 of 2022.

For the Appellant : Mr.R.Venkatesan For the Respondents : Mr.M.Vaidhiyanathan

JUDGMENT

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice) This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 26.7.2022 passed in W.P.No.15974 of 2022, in which the learned Single Judge directed the first respondent to grant admission to Baby Meckenna Thomas, one of the twin children of the appellant in the third respondent school on first priority basis in the II Standard for the academic year 2023-2024, subject to the availability of the seats.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

3. While disposing of the writ petition, the learned Single Judge, in paragraph 7, observed as under:

"7. Since the petitioner has agreed that she will be satisfied if admission is granted to Baby Meckenna Thomas, one of her twin children, in the II standard in the third respondent school for the next academic year 2023-2024 on first priority basis, this Court is of the considered view that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if such a direction is issued to the first respondent subject to the availability of the seats in the II standard for the next academic year on first priority basis."

4. Since the appellant herself agreed that she will be satisfied if admission is granted to her Baby Meckenna Thomas in the II Standard in third respondent school for the next academic year 2023-24 subject to the availability of seats, there is no point in entertaining the present writ appeal.

5. Finding no ground to cause interference in the order of the learned Single Judge, the writ appeal is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

(T.R., ACJ.) (D.K.K., J.) 30.09.2022 Index : Yes/No bbr

T.RAJA, ACJ.

AND D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J.

bbr 30.9.2022