Balamurugan v. State Rep By

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 of IPC in Cr.No.890 of 2022 seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have illegally trespassed into the shed and abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him with deadly weapons and also attempted to kill him and also caused injuries to him . Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons. He would further submit that they have been falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent would submit that totally, there are six accused involved in this case, in which, the petitioners has been arrayed as A1 , 1/3

A5, A3 and A6. They have illegally trespassed into the shed and abused the defacto complainant in filthy language, assaulted him with deadly weapons and also attempted to kill him and caused grievous injures to him. He would further submit that the injured is still in hospital and taking continuous treatment. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel and also the fact that the injured is taking continuous treatment, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners are very much required in this case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, these Criminal Original Petitions are dismissed. 11.08.2022 Vv G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

2/3

Vv 11.08.2022 3/3