Subramani @ Paravai v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.11.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.BASKARAN H.C.P.No.1019 of 2016 Subramani @ Paravai Subramanian ..Petitioner/detenue Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by the Secretary, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-7.

..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS to call for the records of the detention made in memo No.414/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 12.4.2016, passed by the second respondent and to set aside the same and to direct the respondents to produce the detenu Subramani @ Paravai Subramanian, son of Muthusamy, aged about 35 years, now confined in the Central Prison, Puzhal II, Chennai, before this Court and set the detenu at liberty.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balakrishnan For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed, by the detenu, namely, Subramani @ Paravai Subramanian, son of Muthusamy, aged about 35 years, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in No.414/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 12.4.2016, passed by the second Respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982), branding him as a "Goonda", in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents to produce the body of the detenu and set him at liberty forthwith.

At this stage of the hearing of the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the order of detention passed by the second respondent, against the detenu, dated 12.4.2016, has been revoked by the Government, in G.O. Rt. No.2877, Home, Prohibition and Excise (X) Department, dated 30.6.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vvk To 1.The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-7.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal-II, Chennai.

+ 1 cc to M/s. R. Balakrishnan, Advocate Sr.62224 H.C.P.No.1019 of 2016 CNR(CO) EU 10.12.16 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/