A.Simon Williiam Rajadurai, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.03.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Rev.Pet.No.23/2016 in W.P.No.12330 of 2012 A.Simon William Rajadurai .. Petitioner Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Home (Police V) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009
2. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police, Chennai - 600 004
3. The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services, Recruitment Board, No.4, 9th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Chennai - 600 020 ..
Respondent Review Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w.Sec.114 of CPC dated 27.01.2016 and made in W.P.No.12330 of 2014 and consequently direct the respondent to give seniority along with 1997 - 1998 selected Sub Inspectors and also monetary benefits. For Petitioner :
Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu For Respondents :
Mr.K.Dhananjayan, Spl.GP
ORDER
The only grievance expressed by the petitioner is that though he is an in-service candidate, he has not been assigned with proper seniority and therefore came forward to file this Review Petition and sought for appropriate direction in this regard.
2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner who would submit that despite of very many representations submitted in this regard, no proper response is forthcoming and though, this Court has passed a positive order dated 27.01.2016, the respondents are not implementing the same. On account of the pendency of the Writ Appeal and despite the fact no interim order are in operation, the respondents are yet to be comply with the orders. Therefore, prays for appropriate direction.
3. Per contra, Mr.K.Dhananjayan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondent would submit that Writ Appeals are pending adjudication and listed for hearing before the concerned
Hon'ble Bench during next week.
4. In the considered opinion of this court, this Court in exercise of its review jurisdiction, cannot entertain the request made by the petitioner as regards seniority which may be subject to the result of Writ Appeal. Hence, he is always at liberty to workout his remedy in accordance with law before the Competent Forum.
5. Therefore the Review Application is dismissed subject to the above observation.
24.03.2017 Speaking Index : No Internet : Yes rka/sk Note : Issue order copy on 06.04.2017 To
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Home (Police V) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009
2. The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu Police, Chennai - 600 004
3. The Chairman,
Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services, Recruitment Board, No.4, 9th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Chennai - 600 020 M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., rka/sk Rev.Pet.No.23/2016 in WP.No.12330/2012 24.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in