← Library
Madras High CourtCRL MP/12062/2025ordered

Jerman Rakesh v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2025-07-10Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.07.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR in Crl.O.P. No.929 of 2025 Jerman Rakesh ... Petitioner(s) Vs.

The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, E-3, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore.

(Crime No.620 of 2024) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D. Padmanabhan For Respondent : Mr. C. Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******

ORDER

This petition has been filed to extend the time for executing the sureties and to comply with the condition imposed on the petitioner herein by this Court, vide order dated 16.04.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.929 of 2025. 1/4

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as an accused in another Crime No.349 of 2024 on the file of the C4, Rathinapuri Police Station, Coimbatore and subsequently, he was granted anticipatory bail by this Court, vide order dated 24.02.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.930 of 2025 with conditions to execute sureties and to report before the respondent police daily at 10:30 a.m., until further orders. He also submitted that the petitioner is also arrayed as an accused in another Crime No.482 of 2024 on the file of Kovilpalayam Police station, Coimbatore, for which he is appearing before the Kovilpalayam Police station regularly. Therefore, the petitioner is unable to execute sureties within the stipulated time period, as per the order of this Court and to comply with the condition to report before the respondent police, therefore sought for extension of time to furnish sureties and to modify the condition of reporting before the respondent police imposed on the petitioner by this Court, vide order dated 16.04.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.929 of 2025.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner has not complied with the condition even once.

2/4

4. Considering the submissions of both sides, the nature of offence and the fact that the petitioner is arrayed as an accused in three different crime numbers in three different police stations regularly, this Court is inclined to extent the time by two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, to execute sureties and further the condition in para No.16(b) imposed on the petitioner herein/ J.Jerman Rakesh in Crl.O.P.No.929 of 2025 dated 16.04.2025 is modified to the effect that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday and Sunday of every week at 5:00 p.m., until further orders. It is made clear that no further extension of time will be granted.

5. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 10.07.2025 stn M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

3/4

stn To The Inspector of Police, E-3, Saravanampatti Police Station, Coimbatore.

(Crime No.620 of 2024) in Crl.O.P. No.929 of 2025 10.07.2025 4/4