Senthil Kumar M/A 31 Yrs v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.09.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.OP No.21699 of 2016 Senthil Kumar .. Petitioner Vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police W-28, All Women Police Station, Ambattur, Chennai.

.. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in any manner except by due process of law pursuant to the representation dated 20.09.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Muruganantham For respondent : Mr.C.Emalias, Addl.Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the respondent police not to harass the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.

3. On a complaint given by one Kasthuri, petition enquiry is pending. Under such circumstances, blanket order of 'not to harass' cannot be passed. The petitioner shall co-operate for the enquiry and during the course of enquiry, he shall not be harassed. However, if any cognizable offence is made out, this order would not be a shield against the arrest of the accuseds.

With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS IV ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Inspector of Police W-28, All Women Police Station, Ambattur, Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court,Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.T.Muruganantham, advocate,sr.54452. Cnr(co) krd 24/10 Crl.OP No.21699 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/