← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/14504/2026dismissed

Sekar v. The State Rep.By,

2026-06-09Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 09-06-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Sekar ..Petitioner Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Banavaram Police Station, Ranipet District.

Cr.No.131 of 2026.

..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr.No.131 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner:

Mr.G Somasekar For Respondent:

Ms.R.S.Indira, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act in Crime No.27 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner abused the de facto complainant abused the petitioner in filthy language and also attacked him. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the defacto complainant and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that the injured person is still hospitalised. Hence, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. I have given my anxious consideration to either side submissions and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, taking note of the submissions made by the learned counsel on both sides and upon the fact that the injured person is still hospitalized, this Court is of the firm view that it is not

appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 09-06-2026 SHL To:

1. The Judicial Magistrate Court, Sholinghur, Ranipet District

2. The Inspector of Police, Banavaram Police Station, Ranipet District.

3. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras

C.KUMARAPPAN J.

SHL 09-06-2026