Sukumar Swaminathan v. Victoria Srinivasan(Died)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.04.2016 CORAM :

The Hon'ble MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Review Application No.43 of 2016 in W.P.No.30553 of 2013 R.Baskaradoss .. Applicant -vs1.The Hon'ble High Court of Madras, Rep. by the Registrar General, High Court Campus, Chennai.

2.The Bar Council of India, Rep. by its Secretary, No.21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi.

3.A.V.Amudha 4.J.Nazeer Ahmed 5.C.R.Hanna Synthiya Rani 6.K.Latha 7.B.Kayalvizhi 8.S.Malathi 9.M.Fathima 10.K.Srinivasan 11.G.Latha 12.M.Rajendran 13.S.Sarala .. Respondents Review filed under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 of CPC to review the order dated 17.12.2014 passed in W.P.No.30553 of 2013 on the file of this Court.

For Applicant :

Mr.V.Chandrasekaran * * * * *

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The submission sought to be made by the review applicant / petitioner is that the order of which review is sought mentions that the employees were not troubled by the Rules, as none chose to challenge the amendment of 2007. It is submitted by the learned counsel that this amendment has, in fact, assailed in the year 2013 as violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 2.We may note that there are two aspects to this issue. Firstly, what is conveyed in the order is that at least from 2007 to 2013, there was no challenge laid. Secondly, this was not an aspect which troubled the parties even in the course of arguments. If we may say, the learned counsel appearing then was more than satisfied with the result likely to follow and therefore, made his submissions in a confined area. The learned counsel now appearing is not the same who addressed on that date.

3.Now the applicant / petitioner again seeks review of the issue when all we have said is that we will not change the situation retrospectively.

4.We find no error apparent on the face of record to permit review.

5.Review Application stands dismissed.

(S.K.K., CJ.) (M.S.N., J.) 11.04.2016 Index : Yes/No Website : Yes/No sra To 1.The Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Madras, High Court Campus, Chennai.

2.The Secretary, Bar Council of India, No.21, Rouse Avenue Institutional Area, New Delhi.

The Hon'ble Chief Justice and M.Sathyanarayanan, J.

(sra) Rev.Aplw. No.43 of 2016 11.04.2016