R.Parvathasankari v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 19.07.2016 Coram:

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.24909 of 2016 R.Parvathasankari .. Petitioner

Versus

1.Union of India represented by the Secretary to Government Ministry of Finance, New Delhi - 110 001.

2.The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, No.10, Bahadur Sha Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 124.

.. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of Declaration, declaring that the present formation and functioning of the Indian Audit and Account Department is unconstitutional.

For Petitioner ::: Mr.A.Mohamed Ismail For Respondents::: Mr.Su. Srinivasan Assistant Solicitor General for R.1 and R.2

O R D E R

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice) The petitioner, house wife has nothing to do nor is she conversant with the subject matter in question sought to be raised before the Court as a Public Interest Litigation. That being the position, it is not appropriate in such matters to permit a proxy litigation through a set-up petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The writ petition is dismissed, without commenting on the merits of the case, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ksr To 1.The Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi - 110 001.

2.The Comptroller and Auditor General of India, No.10, Bahadur Sha Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 124 + 1 cc to Mr.A. Mohamed Ismail, S.R.No.41473 + 1 cc to Mr.Su. Srinivasan, Advocate SR.40505 W.P.No.24909 of 2016 AK(CO) Eu 01.08.16 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/