Sadhasivam v. State Rep.By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.02.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Crl. OP No.18953 of 2019 and Crl. MP No. 9666 of 2019

1. Sadhasivam

2. Kumudha

3. Aswini

4. Karthika

5. Ramesh

6. Gopal ... Petitioners/Respondents 2 to 7 vs.

1. State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police Station, AWPS Salem District.

... 1st Respondent/ Complainant

2. Jayasudha ... 2nd Respondent/ Defcto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.13 of 2019 on the file of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal, incompetent. For Petitioners: Mr. R.Jayaprakash For Respondent : Mr.Rajeswari Karthikeyan

ORDER

It is brought to the notice of this Court that the marriage itself was dissolved by a decree passed in a mutual consent petition.

2. The learned counsel for the second respondent submitted that an affidavit has also been filed by the second respondent to the effect that the FIR can be quashed, since the marriage itself has been dissolved.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. In view of the above development, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the investigation pending in Crime No.13 of 2019 on the file of the first respondent Police. Accordingly the FIR is quashed and the Criminal Original Petition is allowed.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar jv To

1. The Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police Station, AWPS Salem District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.

+1cc to Mr.R.Jayaprakash, Advocate Sr.6171 +1cc to Mr.Rajeswari Karthikeyan, Advocate Sr.6025 Crl. OP No.18953 of 2019 and Crl. MP No. 9666 of 2019 rld[co] srg 26/02/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/