← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22679/2021closed

S.Pugazenthi v. The Member Secretary

2021-10-25Honourable Mr Justice V.Sivagnanam,Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.22679 of 2021 S.Pugazenthi

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Member Secretary, The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Talamuthu Natarajan Building, No-1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Raja Muthhaih Road, Kannapar Tidal, Periyamed, Chennai - 600 003.

3.S.Parthiban

...Respondents

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.06.2021 in accordance with law within a time stipulated by this Court. For petitioner : Mr.Adinarayana Rao For respondents : Mrs.C.Sumathy Sreekanth Standing Counsel (for R1) Mr.K.Raja Shirinivas Senior Standing Counsel (for R2) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

(The Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM,J) Mrs.C.Sumathy Sreekanth, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the first respondent and Mr.K.Raja Shirinivas, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice for the second respondent. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to consider his representation dated 28.06.2021 in accordance with law.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent would state that based on the representation of the petitioner dated 28.06.2021, the second respondent had already issued notice dated 06.07.2021 under Section 56(1) and 56(7) r/w 85 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. 4.Taking note of the fact that the second respondent had already initiated action on the basis of the representation of the petitioner, we are of the opinion that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, this writ petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar skn To 1.The Member Secretary, The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, Talamuthu Natarajan Building, No-1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Raja Muthhaih Road, Kannapar Tidal,Periyamed,Chennai - 600 003.

+1 cc to Mr.Adinarayana Rao, Advocate Sr.NO.54533 +1 cc to Mr.Raja Shirinivas , Advocate Sr.NO. 55473 W.P.No.22679 of 2021 VG II(CO) A.SK(03.12.2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/