S.Raja v. R.K.Jalil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.12.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR S.Raja .....Petitioner

Versus

1.R.K. Jalil 2.The State, represented by The Inspector of Police V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station Chennai.

....Respondent Prayer: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, Act, 2023 praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent/accused in Crl.O.P.No. 12896 of 2025, dated 29.04.2025 and direct the respondent police to secure and remand the first respondent/accused in custody.

For Petitioner :

Mr.L.K.Charles Alexander For Respondent :

Mr.J.R.Archana Government Advocate, Criminal Side.

---

ORDER

This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is filed seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent herein in Crl.O.P.No.12896 of 2025, dated 29.04.2025 and for a direction to the respondent police to secure and remand the first respondent/accused in custody. 2.The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.12896 of 2025, dated 29.04.2025 with certain conditions in Paragraph No.9(a) and (b) which reads as follows:- "9(a) the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police".

3.Alleging violations of the order dated 29.04.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.12896 of 2025, specifically in Paragraph No.9(a) and (b), this petition has been filed by the de-facto complainant. The notice was also served on the first respondent herein, who has entered appearance through his counsel. It is submitted that though the first respondent herein has executed sureties as ordered by this Court, he was unable to appear before the respondent police due to his personal inconvenience and illness. He is ready to abide by the conditions as imposed by this Court while granting anticipatory bail.

4.Considering the submissions and admissions made by the petitioner and the first respondent respectively, I am of the view that since the anticipatory bail condition have not been complied with, and the first respondent herein has intentionally violated the bail conditions after availing the benefit of anticipatory bail, I am of the view that the anticipatory bail granted to the first respondent herein is liable to be cancelled.

5.In view of the above, this Court had already granted anticipatory bail to the first respondent/accused in Crl.O.P.No.12896 of 2025, dated 29.04.2025, is hereby cancelled and accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.

15.12.2025 MSM To 1.The Inspector of Police V-5, Thirumangalam Police Station Chennai.

2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

K.RAJASEKAR, J., MSM 15.12.2025