Amrose v. J.Ranganathan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08.12.2016
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Crl.O.P. No.27859 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009 1.Amrose 2.Vaithialingam 3.Uma 4.Shanthi ... Petitioners Vs.
J.Ranganathan ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records of the said complaint in C.C.No.376 of 2007 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Maduranthagam against the petitioners herein and quash the same.
For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 09.02.2016, 08.03.2016, 10.03.2016, 07.04.2016 and 05.12.2016, there was no representation for the petitioner. Despite service of notice, the respondent has also not chosen to appear. Hence, he was called absent.
2. Though this petition is filed in the year 2009, even after crossing of so many hearings, the petitioner has not evinced any interest in arguing the case. The petition was left unrepresented. Hence, it is presumed that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Therefore, this Court has got no other option except to dismiss the petition for nonprosecution. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous Petition is also dismissed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gpa To
1. The Judicial Magistrate Maduranthagam KGK(CO) RS(24/01/2017) Crl.O.P. No.27859 of 2009 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/