Mr.Sathrasala Sugunakar, And Another v. Satrasala Venkatachellum Chettys Charities And 8 Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.09.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Review Application No.4 of 2023 1.Sathrasala Sharath Babu No.110, Pondy Bazaar, Ranga Complex, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

2.Sathrasala Shaminath No.110, Pondy Bazaar, Ranga Complex, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.

.... Petitioners vs.

1. Sathrasala Venkatachellum Chetty Charities Rep by its Secretary Mr.Sathrasala Sugunakar New No.11, Old No.4 Kasichetty Lane, III Floor, Sowcarpet, Chennai - 79.

1/5

2. Mr.Sathrasala Sugunakar (deceased) New No.11, Old No.4 Kasichetty Lane, III Floor, Sowcarpet, Chennai - 79.

3.Mr.Manmohan President Trustee No.8/56, Bhaktavachalam Colony 1st Street, Vadapalani Chennai - 26.

4.Mr.Kannudu (deceased) No.114/14 Seven Wells Street, Chennai - 1.

5.Mr.Seshadri Trustree No.74/55, 1st street, 1st Floor Chinnamettupalayam, Tiruvottiyur post, Kaladipet, Chennai - 19.

6.Mr.Arun Kumar No.84/51, Sannathi Street, Kaladipet, Chennai -19.

2/5

7.Mr.E.Sudarsan No.62/33, 1st floor, Venkata Rama Iyer Steet, Kondithope, Chennai -79.

8.Mrs.Suneetha Suresh D/so.late Sathrasala Sugunakar and wife of Mr.Suresh Sathrasala Venkatachellum Charities Flat No.1107, First Block, Arcot Road, Vadapalani, Chennai -26.

9.Mr.Sathrasala Suresh Khanna s/o.late Sathrasala Sugunakar residing at F-6, Gokuladharsh Apartments 69/46, 7th Avenue, Ashok Nagar, Chennai - -83.

.... Respondents Review Petition filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of OS rules r/w. Order XLVII Rule 1 r/w. Section 114 of CPC 1908 to allow this review application by modifying the order dated 08.06.2023 passed in A.No.1553 of 2023 in OA.No.1080 of 2020 in CS.No.678 of 2019 on the file of this Court. For Applicants :

Mr.Ameer Suhail Ahamed for Mr.GRM.Palaniappan.

3/5

For respondents :

No appearance for R1 to R8 Mr.E.Prabhu for R9.

O R D E R

Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the review application has become infructuous, in view of the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court.

2. Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel for the applicants, no further adjudication is required in this review application.

3. Accordingly, this review application is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

13.09.2024.

Index: Yes/No.

Internet: Yes/No.

tsh 4/5

K. KUMARESH BABU, J., tsh Review APLO.No.4 of 2023 13.09.2024 5/5