Chinnusamy v. Gugan Babu

C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.60559 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.03.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.60559 of 2019 1.Chinnusamy 2.Rajamani 3.Rasammal 4.Arukkani

...Petitioners/Appellants

vs.

1.Gugan Babu 2.Shri Ram Gen.Insurance Co Ltd., VCTV, Main Road, Sathy Road, Erode ... Respondents For Petitioners/Appellants : M/s.B.Manimekalai For R1 : Notice Dispensed With For R2 : No Appearance

ORDER

This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1855 days in representation in the CMA SR No.60559 of 2019.

2. Notice to the 1st respondent already dispensed with.

3. Though notice taken to the 2nd respondent served, it name is also appeared in the cause-list, there is no representation for the 2nd respondent. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.60559 of 2019 S.SOUNTHAR, J.

dm

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

5. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition to condone the delay of 1855 days in representation of above appeal, the delay is condoned. C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 is ordered on condition that the petitioners/appellants make a payment of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) to the credit of 'Chief Justice Relief Fund', within a period of two weeks from today, failing which, the condone delay petition in C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 shall stand automatically dismissed without further reference to this Court.

6. On payment of cost within the stipulated time, the C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 shall stand allowed.

7. It is made clear that the petitioners/claimants are not entitled to claim interest for the delay period of 1855 days. 25.03.2025 dm C.M.P.No.3902 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.60559 of 2019 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis