Arunachalam v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.07.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.19292 of 2019 Arunachalam ... Petitioner -Vs1. State Rep. by:
Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Namakkal District.
2. Durairaj ... Respondents Prayer:
Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 1st respondent to not to harass the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Thillai Kumar For respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz (for R1) Additional Public prosecutor
ORDER
This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to not to harass the petitioner.
2.The grievance of the petitioner is that there is a civil dispute between the parties and the respondent police is issuing summons under Sections 160 and 91 of Cr.P.C. for appearance of the petitioner even without registering an FIR and therefore, the summon itself is not sustainable.
3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the respondent police will take a decision with regard to registration of FIR within a short time, if the complaint makes out a cognizable offence and thereafter, will proceed in accordance with law.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.Recording the submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vs/jas To
1. The Inspector of Police, Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell, Namakkal District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.V.Thillai Kumar, Advocate, S.R.No.62430 Crl.O.P.No.19292 of 2019 NMI(CO) CS/22/08/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/