Abinesh v. The State Rep By Its,

Crl.OP.No.19182 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.19182 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 326 and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.80 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, the petitioner and other accused assaulted the defacto complainant's son with iron rod and wooden log and caused grievous injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that there are totally 7 accused. When the defacto complainant's son was sleeping, the petitioner and other accused assaulted him with iron rod and wooden log and caused grievous injuries to him. He would further submit that the injured is still in the hospital. Hence, he vehemently opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.19182 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required in this case. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 16.08.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.19182 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis