Harsha Ben Rajendrakumar.R.J.Bhatt v. Rajendrakumar C. Pandya

C.M.P.No.24652 of 2023 in A.S.No.704 of 2023 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

The plaintiff has appealed against the decree granted for 1/4th share, as against his claim for 1⁄2 share in the suit properties.

2. Mr.B.K.Sreenivasan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would apprehend that the defendant may seek a final decree.

3. A perusal of the decree shows that there is no decree granted declaring the shares of the defendant. Hence, there cannot be a stay of further proceedings pursuant to the decree as it stands today.

4. Hence, this application is dismissed as unnecessary, with liberty to the petitioner to apply if in case the respondent pay Court fee and seek a decree in their favour.

(R.S.M.,J.) (N.S.,J.) 11.12.2023 dsa Page No.1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

dsa C.M.P.No.24652 of 2023 in A.S.No.704 of 2023 11.12.2023 Page No.2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis