Velkumar v. The Inspector Of Police
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 6(4) Tamil Nadu Schedule Commodities (RDCS) order 1982 r/w. Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.123 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1,500 Kgs of PDS rice. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person. He would further submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected with the alleged offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1,500 Kgs of PDS rice. He would also submit that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner shall donate 10 bags each containing 50 kgs of raw rice and 2 bags each containing 25 kgs of Toor dhal to Anbalayam Orphan Home, Kilaku Vasal, Near Milk Dairy Farm, Thalavaipatti, Salem - 636 302, Ph. 9994568269 and on such donation, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Salem and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.
Orphan Home, Kilaku Vasal, Near Milk Dairy Farm, Thalavaipatti, Salem - 636 302, Ph. 999456826.
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
12.08.2022 mn G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
mn
Crl.O.P.No.19064 of 2022 12.08.2022