Madras High CourtCRL OP/19785/2020dismissed

J.Deepak Prabhu v. State Rep By

2021-04-19Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.19785 of 2020 J.DEEPAK PRABHU [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUPPUR CITY POLICE.

CRIME NO.18/2020 For Petitioner : M/S.K.KOTHANDARAMAN Advocate For Respondent : MR. T.SHUNMUGARAJESWARAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 489(A), 489(B) and 420 of IPC, in Cr.No.18 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, who is the partner of M/s.Nice Poly Bacck presented a fake cheque of SBI Bank Jawahar Bhawan Branch, Lucknow, Uttarpradesh for a sum of Rs.4,50,00.000/- . Hence, the present complaint has been lodged before the Law Enforcing Agency.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he is in no way connected with the alleged offence. He further submitted that a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has presented a fake cheque to the tune of Rs.4,50,00,000/- in the complainant Bank with an intention of cheating. He further submitted that on verification of the cheque, the cheque belongs to saving account and in that account, there is no cheque facility and accordingly, it was declared that the cheque is bogus one.

5. Taking into consideration the facts of the case and also the gravity of the offence committed by the petitioner and that investigation of the case is still underway, this Court is of the opinion that it would not be justiciable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner at this point of time.

-sd/- 19/04/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUPPUR CITY POLICE.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.K.KOTHANDARAMAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.19785/2020 Date :19/04/2021 RG.11.05.2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/