K.Gopi v. The State Rep By Its,

Crl.O.P.No.19230 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.516 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on the date of occurrence, the defacto complainant received a phone call stating that his brother was brutally attacked by the gang. Accordingly, he went to the spot to see the injured and when he inquired about the incident, the petitioner had given torture to the victim mother and his brother. Thereafter, A1 and others were brutally attacked the victim with knife in the attack, he sustained injuries. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that due to previous enmity, the defacto complainant lodged false complaint against the petitioner and the petitioner is an innocent person. Therefore, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant, his brother and his mother brutally. Due to which, they sustained sustained injuries. He would further submit that the injured still in hospital. Therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the injured still in hospital and custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required in this case. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the criminal original petition stands dismissed. 16.08.2022 ata

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

ata Crl.O.P.No.19230 of 2022 16.08.2022