← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/17516/2023disposed of

R.Rajkumar v. Manikandan

2023-08-08Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH and Crl.M.P.Nos.11450 & 11453 of 2023 Rajkumar S/o.Rajendran

...Petitioner

Vs 1.Manikandan S/o.Selvam 2.The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Vanthavasi South Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying to call for the records in C.C.No.12 of 2023 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Vanthavasi, Thiruvannamalai and quash the charge sheet filed by the respondent police in the above said case.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mageshwari For Respondents : Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor [R2] ***** 1/4

O R D E R

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.12 of 2023 pending on the file of Judicial Magistrate, Vanthavasi, Thiruvannamalai.

2. The grounds raised by learned counsel for petitioner are all factual in nature and it requires appreciation of evidence and this Court cannot decide the same in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code. It is left open to the petitioner to raise all the grounds before the Court below and the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. This Court is not inclined to interfere with the proceedings pending before the Court below.

3. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Court below to complete the proceedings in C.C.No.12 of 2023 within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 2/4

The trial shall be conducted on a day-to-day basis in accordance with the guidelines given by Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Vinod Kumar Vs State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (Crl) 288 SC]. If the petitioner adopts any dilatory tactics, it is open to the trial Court to insist upon the presence of the petitioner and remand him to custody as per the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Shambhu Nath Singh (JT 2001 (4) SC 3191).

08.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Speaking order:Yes/No gm To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Vanthavasi, Thiruvannamalai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vanthavasi South Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

3/4

N.ANAND VENKATESH, J gm 08.08.2023 4/4