Soundharpandi @ Soundharapandiyan, v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.07.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR 1.Soundharpandi @ Soundharapandiyan 2.Sivan @ Jeevan ... Petitioners Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
Crime No.23 of 2025.
... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest by the respondent Police concerned in Crime No.23 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner :
Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent :
Mr.V.Meganathan, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) Page No.1 of 6
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(2) of BNS in Crime No.23 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution on 22.01.2025, the defacto complainant has laid a pipeline in his land, at that time, the 1st petitioner came there and asked the defacto complainant to remove the pipe. Since the defacto complainant refused, the petitioners scolded the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked him using shovel. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioner are innocent persons and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence. He further submits that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.
4.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution and submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.
Page No.2 of 6
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvannamalai on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:
[a] if the petitioners fail to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b]The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identify proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
[d] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the Page No.3 of 6
defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police officer as and when required;
[f] the petitioners to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for Police custody beyond the first fifteen days, they shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard;
[g] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [h] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
[i] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.
03.07.2025 vv2 Page No.4 of 6
To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvannamalai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.
Page No.5 of 6
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
vv2 03.07.2025 Page No.6 of 6