← Library
Madras High CourtTCA/852/2013withdrawn dismissed

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Dhanapackiam Jewellers

2016-01-29Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.1.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tax Case Appeal No.852 of 2013 Commissioner of Income Tax Madurai .. Appellant

Versus

M/s.Dhanapackiam Jewellers, 290 Dharapuram Road, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District.

(PAN AADFD5766D) .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `B' Bench, dated 26.8.2011, in I.T.(SS)A.No.70/Mds/2007 and against the order dated 6.9.2006 made inITA.No.209/2006-07 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) II Madurai and against the order dated 25.10.2005 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle III, Madurai for the assessment year 2005-06 in PAN No.AADFD5756D.

For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.T.N.Seetharaman

O R D E R

The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of 2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is less than Rs.20,00,000/-.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsels had further submitted that liberty may be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.

3. In view of the said submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present tax case appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clear that the questions of law, which may arise for the decision of this Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular, within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs. ssk.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To:

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras `B' Bench. Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) II, Madurai

3. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle III, Madurai.

+ 1 cc to M/s.T.N.Seetharaman, Advocate SR 5955 + 1 cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate Sr 6377 (13/6/16) (co) prk15/2 Tax Case Appeal No.852 of 2013 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/