Raveendran v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.18836 of 2021 IN C.C.No.205 of 2021 ( ON THE FILE OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AT GUDIYATHAM ) 1 RAVEENDRAN 2 ARUMUGAM 3 KALARANI [ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUDIYATHAM.
[ RESPONDENT ] For Petitioner : M/S.P.RAMESH KUMAR, Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 324 of IPC in C.C.No.205 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a matrimonial dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioners joined together and harassed the defacto complainant and demanded dowry from her. Hence, the complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to these petitioners.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the aforesaid offences are bailable offence in nature, hence, anticipatory bail does not arise. He further submits that charge sheet has been filed and CC.Number assigned in this case as C.C.No.205 of 2021 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Gudiyatham. 5.Considering the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate that the offences are bailable in nature. Hence, anticipatory bail does not arise. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file a petition before the appropriate forum and work out their remedy in the manner known to law.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed with the above observations and directions.
-sd/- 07/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, GUDIYATHAM.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE DISTRICT. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUDIYATHAM.
+1 CC to M/S.P.RAMESH KUMAR, Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.11292 CRL OP.18836/2021 Date :07/10/2021 RW 20/10/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/