← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/18637/2021granted

Settu v. State Rep.By

2021-10-05Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.18637 of 2021 Settu ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Ammapet Police Station, Salem District.

... Respondent (Crime No.403 of 2021) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C, prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.403 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl side)

ORDER

The petitioner who was arrested on 07.09.2021 and remanded to judicial custody for the offences under Sections 273, 328, 511 of IPC, and Sec.57, 59 of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 and Sec.77 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015 and Sec.6, 24(1) of Cigarette and Other Tobacco Products Act 2003, in Crime No.403 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons were found in illegal possession of 409 kgs of banned tobacco products. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner has been in jail from 07.09.2021. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner, without prejudice his rights, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the purpose of improving and maintaining the Government Schools. He further submitted that co-accused had already been released on bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.18074 of 2021 dated 29.09.2021. Therefore, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submits that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner and co-accused had already been released on bail by this Court and there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.5, Salem. and on further condition that:

(a ) the petitioner shall make a non-refundable deposit of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to the credit of the Chief Educational Officer, Salem District for the rehabilitation and improvement of the basic needs of the Government Schools in the said District under necessary acknowledgement, without prejudice to his defence before the trial Court and submit the proof of payment of the said amount before the aforesaid learned Judicial Magistrate, who after perusing the challan/ receipt/acknowledgement, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

(b)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders;

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

7. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered and the Chief Educational Officer shall submit the necessary proof with regard to the expenditure incurred for the improvement/rehabilitation of the Schools in the District before the Director of School Education as and when such works are completed by utilising the money as ordered by this Court -sd/- 05/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.5, SALEM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SALEM DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION).

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMMAPET POLICE STATION, SALEM DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, SALEM.

6 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, SALEM DISTRICT.

CC to M/S. B.VASUDEVAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.18637/2021 Date :05/10/2021 INBA-06/10/2021