Srimathi Madhavan And 3 Others v. Mrs.Revathi Madhavan And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

1. Srimathi Madhavan, No.46, Sai Kripa, 1st Seaward Road, Valmiki Nagar, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 004.

2. Vaijayanthi Sundararajan 9, Marine Vista #04-03, Singapore 449033

3. Padmavathi S Flat No.36, BPCL Colony, No.1, Ranganathan Gardens, Near Blue Star, Anna Nagar West, Chennai - 600 040.

4. P.S.Kesavan 225/4, Natesan nagar, 4th Cross Street, Virugambakkam, Chennai - 92.

All represented by their power Agent J.Ramkumar Beavers Narayani, 6-A, Second Floor, Third Main Road, Postal Colony, West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 033 ..Plaintiffs Vs

1. Mrs.Revathi Madhavan And Another No.254-256, Ram Nagar, IInd Street, Ragamalika apartment, Velachery - 600 042.

2. Mr. Yassavee Madhavan No. 254-256, Ram Nagar, IInd Street, Ragamalika Apartment, Velachery - 600 042.

..Defendants

Civil Suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, prays for a judgment and decree against the defendants;

(a) To pass a preliminary decree of partition and allotting 4/5th share to the 1st to 4th plaintiffs in respect of the schedule mentioned property which is more fully described in the schedule hereunder and to pass a final decree by appointing an Advocate Commissioner to divide the 4/5th share to the respective plaintiffs by metes and bounds and to allocate the same and put the plaintiffs in possession of their share; and (b) To pay the costs of the suit.

For Plaintiffs :

Mr. M. Karthikeyan For Defendants :

Mr. C. Thigarajan

JUDGMENT

This Civil Suit has been filed by the plaintiffs seeking partition by allotment of 4/5th share to the plaintiffs 1 to 4 in respect of the suit schedule property and for costs.

2.

On 24.03.2025, this Court took on record the written statement filed by the defendant and referred the matter to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre attached to the High Court of Madras. The parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 28.01.2026, and the same has been filed before this Court along with the Mediation report.

3.

Heard the learned counsel appearing on both sides and perused the records, including the Mediation report.

4.

This Court has perused the terms of Settlement Agreement, which has been signed by the respective parties, and finds no legal impediment in recording the same.

5.

Accordingly, the said Settlement Agreement is recorded and shall form part of the decree. The suit is decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement. No order as to costs.

6.

The Registry is directed to refund the Court fee to the plaintiffs as per the Rules in force.

10-02-2026 klt

P.DHANABAL, J.

klt 10-02-2026