S.Rajendran v. State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 05.01.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.19817 of 2020 S. Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Civil Supplies Criminal Investigation Department(CSCID), Chennai District (Crime No.270 of 2020) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.270 of 2020 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent.

For Petitioners : M/s. Law Vision For Respondent : Mr.S. Karthikeyan Addl.P.P

O R D E R

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner is A1. He apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Section 6(4) of Tamilnadu Scheduled Commodities (RDCS) Order 1982, r/w. Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 in Crime No.270 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the owner of the lorry, in which, 30 bags of PDS rice containing 50 Kgs each has been transported unauthorisedly. Hence, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner .

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that A2 in this case, who is the driver of the lorry, without the knowledge of the petitioner/owner, transported PDS rice unauthorisedly. Now, A2 has been arrested and released on bail and the petitioner is no way connected with the offence. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that the driver/A2 has transported the PDS rice unauthorizedly based on the instructions given by the owner/petitioner. He would further submit that A2 in this case has been released on bail.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner is prepared to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) without prejudice to his defence.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and co-accused released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions :

a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judge, Metropolitan Magistrate No.VI, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of Tamil Nadu Advocate Clerks Association, Indian Bank, High Court Branch, (A/c.No.484026006, IFSC No.IDIB 000 M 157), within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court ; [d] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 05/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI, EGMORE, CHENNAI.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CIVIL SUPPLIES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT(CSCID), CHENNAI DISTRICT.

5 THE TAMIL NADU ADVOCATE CLERKS ASSOCIATION, INDIAN BANK, HIGH COURT BRANCH, (A/C.NO.484026006, IFSC NO.IDIB 000 M 157) CC to M/S.LAW VISION Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.19817/2020 Date :05/01/2021 MK:01/02/2021