← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/1471/2016dismissed

Tmt.R.Guna, Aged 50 Years v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2017-01-09Honourable Mr Justice T.Mathivanan,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN H.C.P.No.1471 of 2016 R.Guna

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep by its Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

...Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS to call for the records pertaining to the order of detention passed by the second respondent, in his proceedings, in Memo No.646/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 5.7.2016 and to set aside the same and to direct the respondents to produce the detenu R.Rajesh, son of Ravi, now confined in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and to set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathish Rajan For Respondents : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed, by the mother of the detenu, namely, Rajesh, aged about 30 years, son of Ravi, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in No.646/BCDFGISSSV/2016, dated 5.7.2016, passed by the second Respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982), branding him as a "Goonda", in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents to produce the body of the detenu and to set him at liberty.

At this stage of the hearing of the Habeas Corpus Petition, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the order of detention passed by the second respondent, against the son of the petitioner, dated 5.7.2016, has been revoked by the Government, in G.O. Rt. No.3720, Home, Prohibition and Excise (XIII) Department, dated 11.8.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order.

Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is dismissed, as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vvk To

1. The Secretary, The State of Tamil Nadu, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4. The Joint Secretary to Government, Public (Law & Order) Fort St. George, Chennai-9.

5. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

KJ(CO) RS(13/02/2017 H.C.P.No.1471 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/