← Library
Madras High CourtWP/25427/2016disposed of

M.Ramalingam, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2016-07-28Honourable Mr Justice M. Sathyanarayanan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 28.07.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.25427 of 2016 M.Ramalingam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the District Collector, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent herein to survey and identify the boundaries of the land having an extent of 63⁄4 cents (having 2943 sq.ft.,) having old patta No.347 and situate in Thagamtheerthapuram Village, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District and fix the boundary stones for the same and effect name transfer into my name by correcting the revenue records suitably.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ramalingam Party-in-person For Respondents : Mr.D.Suryanarayanan Govt Advocate.

O R D E R

By consent this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner would state that he purchased agricultural patta dry land having an extent of 63⁄4 cents (2943 sq.ft.,) in old Patta No.347, situate in Thagamtheerthapuram Village, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District from one Thangavel, through a registered sale deed dated 15.11.1999, bearing Document No.2632/1999, registered on the file of the SubRegistrar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District. The petitioner often facing difficultly and hardship from the third respondent, who is trying to grab the land with the help of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

revenue officials. The petitioner, in order to protect his possession, made a request to the second respondent to survey and identify the boundaries of his land and in this regard, has also submitted a representation dated 01.01.2016 to the respondents and it was also received and acknowledged, however, nothing has been done so far and therefore, came forward to file this writ petition.

3. The petitioner/party-in-person would submit that the petitioner has also paid the necessary fees on 18.06.2015 along with the application dated 19.06.2015 and despite that no orders have been passed, came forward to file this Writ Petition.

4. This Court, in the light of the above facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the claim projected by the petitioner, directs the second respondent to act on the application for pointing Field Boundary Line dated 19.06.2015, on merits and in accordance with law and pass orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner.

This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. vsm s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Villupuram, Villupuram District.

2.The Tahsildar, Chinnasalem Taluk, Villupuram District.

+ 1 cc to Mr.M.Ramalingam, Advocate SR 42832 + 1 cc to Govt.Pleader SR 43049 ctr(co) prk1/8 Writ Petition No.25427 of 2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/