← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/18814/2021granted

Kumar v. The State Rep By

2021-10-27Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.18814 of 2021 KUMAR [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGALPATTU TOWN POLICE STATION, IN CRIME NO. 83/2021 For Petitioner : M/S.N.MAHENDRA BABU Advocate For Respondent : MR. C.E.PRATAP, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 5, 7(3) of Lotteries Regulation Act, 1998 in Cr.No.83 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner illegally sold the lottery tickets of other States to the public and the same was seized by the respondent police.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, he further submitted that the petitioner, without prejudice to his rights, on his own volition, is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the purpose of improving and maintaining the Government Schools. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner illegally sold the other State Lottery tickets and there are 11 previous cases of similar nature pending against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the learned Counsel on both sides, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Chengalpattu District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b) the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) to the credit of the Chief Educational Officer, Chengalpattu District for the rehabilitation and improvement of the basic needs of the Government Schools in the said District under necessary acknowledgment, without prejudice to their defence before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. For a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

7. Chief Educational Officer shall submit the necessary proof with regard to the expenditure incurred and works that were done for the improvement/rehabilitation of the Schools in the District before the Commissioner of School Education as and when such works are completed by utilising the money as ordered by this Court. -sd/- 27/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, CHENGALPATTU.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION).

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGALPATTU TOWN POLICE STATION, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE CHIEF EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT.

+1 CC to M/S.N.MAHENDRA BABU Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.11952 CRL OP.18814/2021 Date :27/10/2021 INBA-01/11/2021