Jafrulla Jagaulla v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Seventh day of October Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.18859 of 2021 1 JAFRULLA JAGAULLA [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 MADHINA 3 KOUSIYA 4 JINATH 5 KAIRUN Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.
REF:CR.NO.536/2021.
For Petitioner : M/S.A.RAJA MOHAMED Advocate For Respondent : M/S. A.GOPINATH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sec. 147, 294(b), 323, 506(ii) IPC, r/w.4 of TNPWH Act, in Crime No.536 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and the defacto complainant are neighbours. There was a quarrel in between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, due to which the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant using wooden log. Thereby the victim sustained injuries. Hence the complaint was registered by the Law Enforcing Agency.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners did not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the injured discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Considering the fact and circumstances of the case and also considering that the injured person discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Arcot on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) the petitioners shall affix his photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b) the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.
(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f) if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 07/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARCOT 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VELLORE [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN POLICE STATION, VELLORE DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1 CC to M/S.A.RAJA MOHAMED Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.11136 CRL OP.18859/2021 Date :07/10/2021 APN 25/10/2021