← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/18746/2021dismissed

Sedhuraman v. State Rep.By

2021-11-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Eighteenth day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION NOs.18746,18778,18771 AND 17911 of 2021 SEDHURAMAN [PETITIONER / ACCUSED IN CRL.OP.NO.18746/2021] NEETHITAMILAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED IN CRL.OP.NO.18778/2021] RAJAVARMAN [PETITIONER / ACCUSED IN CRL.OP.NO.18771/2021] 1.NATARAJAN [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 2.THIRUNAVUKARASU IN CRL.OP.NO.17911/2021] Vs STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IN ALL THE PETITIONS] PERALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.983/2021) For Petitioner : A.PARVEEN Advocate [IN ALL THE PETITIONS] For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) [IN ALL THE PETITIONS] PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

[IN CRL.OP.NOs.18746,18778 AND 18771/2021] PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL 438 Cr.P.C. [IN CRL.OP.NO.17911/2021] ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.09.2021 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294 (b), 324, 427, 506(ii) and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.983 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to property dispute, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant with filthy language and also assaulted him with Aruval. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that there is a case in counter and that the petitioners have been suffering incarceration for more than 55 days from 19.09.2021 and he would pray for grant of bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would raise strong objection stating that the victim sustained grievous injury and still in hospital and that the investigation has not been completed. 5.Considering the grave nature of offence and the fact that the injured is still in hospital and the investigation has not been completed, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 18/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERALAM POLICE STATION, TIRUVARUR DISTRICT.

2 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, NANNILAM.

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to A.PARVEEN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL.OP.18746,18778,18771 AND 17911/2021 Date :18/11/2021 CSK 30/11/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/