The Tamil Nadu State Transport v. Salammal (Died) 1. S. Karthikeyan

CMP No.22553 of 2023 in CMA SR No.108750 of 2018 N.ANAND VENKATESH.,J Though notice has been served on the respondents 2 to 5, there is no representation either in person or through counsel. Notice to respondents 6 to 8 is dispensed with, since the respondents 6 to 8 remained ex parte before the tribunal.

2.

This Civil Miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 238 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant and perused the records.

4.

Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the miscellaneous petition is allowed and the delay of 238 days is condoned.

5.

Registry is directed to number the main Civil miscellaneous appeal and list the same for admission. When the matter is posted for admission, the name of learned counsel for the 1st respondent shall also be printed in the cause-list.

6.

It is made clear that for the period of delay of 238 days, the appellant will not be entitled for any interest if in the event of this Court enhancing the amount of compensation fixed by the Tribunal.

12.04.2024 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

kp https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2