Murali v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL.O.P.No.22256 of 2016 G.CHOCKALINGAM, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.1425 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that on account in a wordy quarrel, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant due to which, the victim sustained injuries and was hospitalized. Subsequently, the victim has been discharged from the hospital.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

4.

Considering the fact that the victim has been discharged from the hospital, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail. Accordingly, it is ordered that the petitioner shall be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his surrender before the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer or to the satisfaction of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai; and on further condition that (ii) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

(iii) If the petitioner fails to comply with any one of the above conditions imposed by this Court, the anticipatory bail granted shall stand automatically dismissed without any further reference to this Court.

30.09.2016 vrc