Pa.Moorthy v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.01.2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.256 of 2016 Pa.Moorthy .. Petitioner Vs.
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Principal Secretary to Government Home (SC) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4.
... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent herein to issue appropriate directions to the reviewing authority or accepting authority as the case may be, of the petitioner to award appropriate grading for the period from 15.06.2011 to 31.03.2012 on the basis of the award of outstanding gradings for preceding assessment year 20102011 and the subsequent assessment year 2012-2013 to the petitioner and his outstanding performance during the relevant period as reflected in his self-assessment report and the appreciation certificates, pertaining to the said period within a limited time frame, and in any event, prior to the commencement of selection process for appointment IPS under the Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 for the year 2014.
For Petitioner : M/s.M.Ravi For respondents:M/s.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, Spl.GP.
O R D E R
The petitioner filed the writ petition seeking for direction to the first respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner for grant of appropriate overall grading for the year 2011-2012 on the basis of my performance as reflected in his self assessment report and the appreciation certificates, pertaining to the said period.
2.The case of the petitioner is that in pursuance of the notification issued by the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in the year 1996, he was selected and appointed as Deputy Superintendent of Police (Category-I) on 01.06.1998. After completing his basis training, he served in six sensitive sub divisions and promoted as Additional Superintendent of Police on 01.04.2006 and promoted as Superintendent of Police on 12.10.2007.
3.According to the petitioner, he discharged his service to the entire satisfaction of his superiors and for the benefit of common public. The petitioner has got 36 appreciations/commendation certificates/Letters from the superiors of the police department and other Government departments.
4.The grievance of the petitioner is that when his seniors were conferred with the Indian Police Service within a period of 10 to 12 years, he already waited for more than 17 years, however in the year 2013 selection list for appointment of Indian Police Service, the petitioner was not considered, while three of his juniors were included in the list. Then only the petitioner came to know that for the year 2011-2012 the appropriate authority has not awarded any grading at all. 5.The petitioner would further state that the Government of Tamil Nadu issued a GO.Ms.No.121, P&AR (S) Department dated 29.09.2011, providing necessary guidelines prescribed for making necessary representations, even against the overall grading/downgrading in the Confidential Reports. Therefore, the petitioner sent a representation dated 06.07.
2015 to the second respondent. Since, there was no response, he preferred a detailed representation to the first respondent dated 25.11.2015 to review and reconsider the grading for the year 2011-2012. The petitioner has also sent his additional representation dated 23.12.2015. Since, the representations were not considered, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.
6.Heard the submissions of Mr.M.Ravi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, Special Government Pleader who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
7.Though the petitioner prayed for a larger relief, this Court in the light of the facts and circumstances and without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the representations dated 25.11.2015 and 23.12.2015 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and communicate the decision taken, to the petitioner.
8.The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsh To The Principal Secretary to Government Home (SC) Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.
The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-4.
+1 cc to Mr.M.Ravi, Advocate, sr.682 +1 cc to Government Pleader, sr.994 W.P.No.256 of 2016.
scd co kra 04.02.2016