← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/162/2016closed

R.Paneerselvam v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2016-03-03Honourable Mr Justice S. Nagamuthu,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.03.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P.No.162 of 2016 R.Paneerselvam ... Petitioner -Vs1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Superintendent of Police Ariyalur District Ariyalur.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Jayamkondam Ariyalur District.

3.The Inspector of Police Jayamkondam Police Station Jayamkondam Ariyalur District.

4.M.S.Suresh ... Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of direction, in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents herein to produce the corpus body of the petitioner's daughter namely P.Angela, aged 21 years and set her at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Gouthaman For RR1 to 3 : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentren, Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3.

2. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is the father of the detenue, namely, Angela, aged about 21 years. He had filed the Habeas Corpus Petition praying, that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents, to produce the body of Angela, daughter of Paneerselvam, aged about 21years, before this Court and to set her at liberty, forthwith.

3. It has been stated, that the petitioner/the father of the detenue, is an agricultural coolie. The detenue is the eldest daughter. She had studied B.Sc. Nursing course, at St.Xavier Nursing College, Kumbakonam. She had been missing from the month of February, 2015. Therefore, the petitioner had lodged a complaint, before the respondents on, 18.04.2015. It has been alleged, that the fourth respondent had abducted the detenue. Since no effective steps had been taken by the respondents 1 to 3, the petitioner had preferred the present Habeas Corpus Petition, before this Court.

4. At this stage of the hearing of this Habeas Corpus Petition, the third respondent produced the detenue, before this Court. On enquiry, she had stated that she had married the fourth respondent, on 03.02.2015, and she is living with her husband, in her father-in-law's house, at Ambur. An extract of the Marriage Register, from the Registration Department, had been produced before this Court, showing that the detenue had married the fourth respondent. On enquiry, she had stated that she would wish to live with the fourth respondent, in her matrimonial home, at Ambur. As the detenue is a major, she is permitted to live with her husband, the fourth respondent herein, as per her wish. Since no further orders are necessary, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed, permitting the detenue to live with her husband, in her matrimonial home as per her wish.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gms

To 1.The Superintendent of Police State of Tamil Nadu Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Jayamkondam, Ariyalur District.

3.The Inspector of Police Jayamkondam Police Station Jayamkondam, Ariyalur District.

4.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

+ 1 cc to Mr.A. Gouthaman, Advocate Sr.13831 H.C.P.No.162 of 2016 RSY(CO) EU 22.3.16