← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/19001/2021granted

Vimal Kumar v. State Rep.By

2021-10-08Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.10.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Crl.O.P.No.19001 of 2021 Vimal Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep by, The Sub Inspector of Police, Polur Police Station, Thiruvanamalai District (Crime No.909 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.909 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.K. Nepolean For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 24.09.2021 for the offences under Section 399 of IPC, in Crime No.909 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. Totally there are 5 accused in this case and the petitioner herein arrayed as A5. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused attempted to break open the wine shop and some deadly weapons was recovered from the petitioner and other accused. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not involved in the offence and he has been falsely implicated. He further submits that he is in jail from 24.09.2021. He further submits that the petitioner is the coolie of country boat and there is no intention to commit the offence. Hence he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner and other accused attempted to break open the wine shop and at the time of arrest they were in possession of some deadly weapons. He further submits there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. Hence he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the fact that there is no previous case pending as against the petitioner and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur and on further condition that: (a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

-sd/- 08/10/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POLUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, POLUR.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POLUR POLICE STATION, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.

+1 CC to M/S. D.K.NEPOLEAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.11254 CRL OP.19001/2021 Date :08/10/2021 RW 08/10/2021