← Library
Madras High CourtWA/2206/2024dismissed

C.Vasantha v. Inspector General Of Registration

2025-09-15Honourable Mr Justice S. M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr Justice C. Saravanan5 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15.09.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.A.No. 2206 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.15591 of 2024 C.Vasantha ...Appellant Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhom High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.District Revenue Officer (Stamps), Coimbatore.

3.Joint Sub-Registrar - II, Gobichettipalayam.

...Respondents

PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 04.03.2024 made in WP.No.5480 of 2024 on the file of this Court.

For Appellant : Mr.M.Sundaresan For Mr.N.Damodaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Senthil Murugan, Spl. Govt. Pleader ****** 1/5

J U D G M E N T

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) Under assail is the writ order dated 04.03.2024 passed in W.P.No.5480 of 2024.

2. The Writ Petitioner is the appellant. The Writ Petition has been instituted seeking a direction to return the original sale deed dated 10.06.2009 registered as Doc.No.1021/2009 on the file of the Joint Sub-Registrar, Gobichettipalyam based on the order dated 18.08.2017 made in CMA.No.3645 of 2013, wherein the CMA Court directed the Authorities to return the sale deed after complying with the Registration formalities, if any.

3. The writ Court considered the order passed by this Court in CMA.No.3645 of 2013 dated 18.08.2017. However, the writ Court has arrived at a conclusion that to execute the order passed in CMA, no Writ would lie. That apart, the Writ Petition has been filed after a lapse of about 7 years from the passing of the order in CMA.No.3645 of 2013. However, liberty was granted to the appellant herein to workout her remedy in the manner known to law.

2/5

4. This Court is of the considered view that the Writ Court has rightly rejected the relief and granted liberty to the appellant to workout her remedy in the manner known to law. The appellant is not entitled for any further relief.

5. However, the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the review application No.232 of 2024 filed by the respondents was dismissed by the CMA Court on 04.07.2025.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (S.M.S., J.) (C.S.N., J.) 15.09.2025 dsa Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No :Yes/No Speaking order/ Non-Speaking order 3/5

To:

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhom High Road, Chennai - 600 028.

2.District Revenue Officer (Stamps), Coimbatore.

3.Joint Sub-Registrar - II, Gobichettipalayam.

4/5

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and C.SARAVANAN, J.

dsa W.A.No. 2206 of 2024 15.09.2025 5/5