T.Gopinathan v. Gomathi Thillaikarasi

C.M.P.Nos.1039, 1040 & 1042 of 2021 and C.M.P.No. 20233 of 2021 and C.M.P.Nos.8535 & 8536 of 2017 in C.R.P.No.3723 of 2012 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

All these petitions have been filed consequent to the death of the first and second petitioners and second respondent in the revision petition. These petitions have been filed to condone the delay in filing the application to set aside the abatement and to set aside the abatement and to bring on record the legal representatives as stated in the petitions. 2.In the affidavit filed in support of the petition with respect to the delay in filing these applications, it had been stated that owing to Covid - 19 lockdown, the death of the first and second petitioners and second respondents was not immediately informed to enable them to file the applications. In view of such circumstances, there had been delay. It is stated that the delay is neither willful nor wanton. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

sms 3.In view of the fact that it would be appropriate that the matter is to be heard and decided on merits. I would allow to bring on record the legal representatives of the first and second petitioners and second respondent as stated in the connected petitions. sms 21.07.2022 (1/3) C.M.P.Nos.1039, 1040 & 1042 of 2021 and C.M.P.No. 20233 of 2021 and C.M.P.Nos.8535 & 8536 of 2017 in C.R.P.No.3723 of 2012 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis