Shrinithi Capital Private Ltd v. S.Jayashree

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1.M/s.Shrinith Capital Private Ltd.

2.M/s.Hinduja Leyland Finance ... Applicants in both applications vs.

1.S.Jayashree 2.Dhatchayini 3.Ganapathy ... Respondents in both applications For Applicants : Mr.K.Sendurpandi (in both applications) For Respondents : Set Exparte (in both applications) ***** COMMON ORDER These applications have been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner with direction to seize the schedule mentioned vehicles which are lying under the custody of the respondents or their men, agents, Page No.1 of 4

servants or anyone claiming under them from the premises of 1st respondent at No.168, Porur Garden Phase 2, Vanagaram, Ambattur, Thiruvallur - 600 095, or at any other place where the scheduled assets are found, with the police aid and by breaking open locks if necessary and to take the same into his custody and sell the same at fair market price.

2. As directed by this Court on 28.07.2025, the applicants have effected substituted service on the 2nd respondent by effecting paper publication. The paper publications have been filed along with AOS. The 2nd respondent remains un-represented. Hence, the 2nd respondent is set exparte by this Court.

3. The respondents 1 and 3 have already been set exparte by this Court vide its order dated 28.07.2025. Since all the respondents are set exparte and since the vehicles have already been re-possessed by the Advocate Commissioner and the custody of the same has been handed over to the applicants, nothing survives for further adjudication in these applications.

Page No.2 of 4

4. Accordingly, these applications are closed. 18.08.2025 sp Page No.3 of 4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE.

J.

sp 18.08.2025 Page No.4 of 4