M/S.Ganesh Cars 9p) Ltd., Rep. v. The Commercial Tax Officer,
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 15.6.2016 Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.31252 to 31254 of 2003 M/s.Ganesh Cars (P) Ltd., rep.
by its Chairman N.Gajendran
...Petitioner
Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Vellore (North), Vellore.
...Respondent
PETITIONS under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writs of Certiorarified Mandamus (i) to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein in his proceedings in TNGST No.4201276/ 1998-99 dated 27.10.2003, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to refund the excess amount of entry tax of Rs.6,01,032/- to the petitioner relating to the assessment year 1998-99 (WP.No.31252 of 2003); (ii) to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein in his proceedings in TNGST No.4201276/2000-01 dated 27.10.2003, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to refund the excess amount of entry tax of Rs.11,04,854/- to the petitioner relating to the assessment year 2000-01 (WP.No.
31253 of 2003); and (iii) to call for the records on the file of the respondent herein in his proceedings in TNGST No. 4201276/1999-2000 dated 27.10.2003, quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to refund the excess amount of entry tax of Rs.10,65,248/- to the petitioner relating to the assessment year 1999-2000 (WP.No.31254 of 2003).
Mrs.R.Hemalatha For Respondent :
Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, AGP COMMON ORDER Heard both.
2. The petitioner seeks to quash the impugned proceedings issued by the respondent and to direct the respondent to refund the excess amount of entry tax collected from the petitioner for the relevant assessment years.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. Learned counsel on either side submit that the legal issue involved in these matters pertaining to refund is covered by the Hon'ble Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Khivraj Motors Limitd Vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) and another [W.A.Nos.3201 to 3204 of 2014 dated 4.2.2010 and based on the said decision, the petitioner is entitled to refund of the excess amount of entry tax collected. The said judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench was followed by a learned Single Judge in M/s.Susee Auto Sales & Services (P) Ltd. Vs. CTO (FAC) [W.P.No.4927 of 2004 dated 10.2.2016].
4. Following the same, the writ petitions are allowed with a direction to the respondent to enquire into the matters and if it is found that excess amounts had been collected at the time of payment of entry tax, the balance amounts shall be refunded to the petitioner by adjusting the tax payable under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act. The above direction shall be complied with within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To The Commercial Tax Officer, Vellore (North), Vellore. 1 cc to Special Government Pleader, (Taxes), sr.33547 1 cc to M/s.R.Hemalatha, Advocate, sr.32982 RS WP.Nos.31252 to 31254 of 2003 rk co kra 28.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/