Arikrishnan v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.19633 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.19633 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 324, 307 IPC in Crime No.241 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity regarding land dispute, there arose a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, in which the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused grievous injuries. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and caused grievous injuries. He would further submit that there are four https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.19633 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Anu previous cases pending as against the petitioner. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. .

5. Considering the previous cases pending against the petitioner, this Court finds that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 26.08.2022 Anu Crl.O.P.No.19633 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis