Mrs.D.Loganayagi v. The District Revenue Officer

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 21.2.2018 Coram :

The Honourable Mr.Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM Writ Petition No.34782 of 2013 1.Mrs.D.Loganayagi 2.Mrs.M.Saratha 3.Mr.P.Nirmal

...Petitioners

Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram.

3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram.

...Respondents

PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to execute the order dated 26.4.2013 issued by the 2nd respondent.

For Petitioners :

Mr.R.Gopalakrishnan For Respondents :

Mr.N.Manikandan, GA

ORDER

Heard both and perused the records.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to implement the order passed by the second respondent.

3. It is seen that the application of the petitioner for issuance of patta was rejected by the third respondent and that the same was reversed by the second respondent.

4. The learned Government Advocate submits that the order passed by the second respondent was set aside by the first respondent by order dated 17.2.2018 and a copy of the order dated 17.2.2018 is produced before this Court for perusal. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. In the light of the above, the above writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram.

3.The Tahsildar, Tambaram.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 14498 WP.No.34782 of 2013 sr(CO) TR(08/03/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/