← Library
Madras High CourtWP/20736/2024disposed of

R.Gokila v. The Secretary

2024-07-24Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Mr.Justice C.Kumarappan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.07.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and W.M.P.Nos.22682 & 22683 of 2024 R.Gokila ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road Park Town, Chennai -600 003.

2. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras, Chennai -600104.

... Respondents Prayer :- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent for Revaluation of the three Law Papers i.e. Law Paper-I, Law Paper-II, and Law paper-III in the Main Examination conducted on 04.11.2023 and 05.11.2023 for the post of the Civil Judge in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service in 1/5

Notification No. 12/2023 dated 01.06.2023 published by the respondent under the registration No. 1701001052 and Application No. 2312009284 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner :

Mr.C.Prabakaran For Respondents :

Mr.B.Vijay (for R2).

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondent for revaluation of the three Law Papers i.e. Law Paper-I, Law Paper-II, and Law paper-III in the Main Examination conducted on 04.11.2023 and 05.11.2023 for the post of the Civil Judge in the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service in Notification No. 12/2023 dated 01.06.2023 published by the respondent under the registration No. 1701001052 and Application No. 2312009284 within a stipulated time.

2. The petitioner admittedly participated in the process of selection to the post of Civil Judge Junior Division. She was unsuccessful in the selection process and her name was not found in the selection list. The petitioner 2/5

submitted an application to the respondents to furnish the certified copy of the answer scripts. Since the respondents have not considered the same, the present writ petition came to be instituted.

3. Clause 21(a) of the recruitment notification states that "No candidate is permitted to peruse/obtain copies of the answer sheets (Preliminary and Main Examination) till finalisation of the recruitment process." The learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the recruitment process is yet to be completed and the Government has not passed orders appointing the selected candidates. Therefore, the request of the petitioner cannot be considered.

4. In view of the fact that the recruitment process is yet to be completed, the petitioner is at liberty to submit an application after completion of the process and in the event of receiving any such application, the first respondent may consider the same in accordance with the rules applicable.

3/5

5. With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (S.M.S.J.,) (C.K.J.,) 24.07.2024 Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order (sha) To

1. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road Park Town, Chennai -600 003.

2. The Registrar General, High Court, Madras, Chennai -600104.

4/5

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

(sha) 24.07.2024 5/5