The Managemnent Standard v. Deputy Commissioner Of Labour
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.11.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MRS.PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.A.Nos.241 to 243 of 2004 and WA.MP.Nos.394 to 396 of 2004 W.A.No.241 of 2004:
The Management Standard Industries, A. Super I Industrial Estate K.Pudur, Madurai - 625 007, rep. by its Partner S.P.G.R.Nithyanandam.
... Appellant Vs.
1.Deputy Commissioner of Labour, 2.K.R.Arunachalam 3.T.R.Ramachandran 4.M.Selvam 5.M.Somu 6.G.Manimegalai 7.S.Pandian 8.M.Joseph 9.A.Punniaraj 10.P.R.Venugopal 11.A.Rajendran 12.M.K.Jamal Mohaideen 13.B.Dorariraj 14.A.Gopal 15.M.Rajendran 16.K.Kathiresan
W.A.No.242 of 2004:
The Management Standard Industries, A. Super I Industrial Estate K.Pudur, Madurai -625 007, rep. by its Partner S.P.G.R.Nithyanandam.
... Appellant Vs.
1.Deputy Commissioner of Labour, 2.M.Alimuthu 3.M.Mohammed Ghouse 4.R.Ramesh 5.N.Thivagaran 6.T.Rajarathinam 7.L.Nagasundaram 8.V.Kandasamy 9.R.Nagasundaram 10.G.Baskaran 11.R.Govindarajan 12.K.Bakrudeen 13.R.Vinayagamoorthy 14.A.Sermadurai 15.S.Sheik Ismail W.A.No.243 of 2004:
The Management Standard Industries, A. Super I Industrial Estate K.Pudur, Madurai -625 007, rep. by its Partner S.P.G.R.Nithyanandam.
... Appellant Vs.
1.Deputy Commissioner of Labour, 2.S.Alagusundaram 3.M.Babu 4.T.Thanalakshmi
5.A.Shanim 6.S.Ponnuthai 7.P.Malaichamy 8.K.Periasamy 9.N.Raman 10.J.Srinivasan 11.A.Malaichamy 12.R.Senthil Kumar 13.K.Prema 14.G.Muthumani 15.K.Chandran 16.K.R.Ramesh W.A.No.241 of 2004 filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the Court dated 03.12.2002 made in W.P.No.11411 of 1999.
W.A.No.242 of 2004 filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the Court dated 03.12.2002 made in W.P.No.11413 of 1999.
W.A.No.243 of 2004 filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order of the Court dated 03.12.2002 made in W.P.No.11412 of 1999.
Petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction to Call for the records of the Ist Respondent made in Order in M.W.8/98 (in WP.11411 of 1999), 9/98 (in WP.11412 of 1999) and 10/98 (in WP.11413 of 1999), dated 27.08.1998 and the consequential order dated 18.03.1999 quash the same.
For Appellant : Mr.K.Sathish in all appeals for M/s.S.Silambanan & Associates For Respondents : Mr.G.Purushothaman for R2,3,7 to 10,12,13 & 16 in W.A.241/2004; R2 to 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 & 14 in W.A.242/2004; R2, 8 to 12 in W.A.243/2004 No appearance for R4 & R5 in W.A.241/2004
R6 & R11 - Dismissed in W.A.241/2004 R14 & R15 - Died in W.A.241/2004 R3,5,6,13&15 - Dismissed in W.A.243/2004 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) The learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter stands resolved in the mediation and the appeals are thus infructuous.
2. The appeals, accordingly, stand disposed of as compromised. No costs. Consequently, WA.MP.Nos.394 to 396 of 2004 stand closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bbr To The Deputy Commissioner of Labour, W.A.Nos.241 to 243 of 2004 EV(CO) CA(15/12/2015)